Weeks after the car left

Then the charge
comes back.

A guest tells their bank they were never there. You have days to answer, and the shift that could have answered it was two months ago.

Chargeback noticeReason given"Service not rendered"Amount held back$42.00Evidence duedeadline set by the network

Where the record starts

It starts with a plate,
not with a ticket.

A ticket says a car was here. A plate says WHICH car, read by the camera itself and written down before anyone touched a keyboard.

Camera-read plate
Confidence saved with the read
Reviewable from the first scan
CU52YPCAMERA LOCKEDread by the camera,not typed by a person

While the car is still on the lot

The record writes itself, with names on it.

Every movement is appended as it happens and never rewritten, and each line carries whoever recorded it. Nobody reconstructs a night afterwards.

Checked inrecorded by Marco RuizPhotographed and inspectedrecorded by Marco RuizParked, bay 12recorded by Elena CruzRequested by textrecorded by the guestReturned to the curbrecorded by Nico Barrosappended, neveredited afterwards

Before a record can be wrong

One car cannot hold two tickets.

Two people checking the same plate in at the same moment do not both succeed. The plate itself is claimed inside the check-in, so the second one is refused rather than quietly creating a car you are holding twice.

CU52YPchecked in 7:12 PMCU52YPchecked in 7:12 PMthe second one is refused

The day the dispute lands

Nobody starts a folder.

When a dispute arrives, your team can review a report of the available visit details and prepare a response without rebuilding the night from memory.

What goes into it

One visit, ready to review.

None of it is written for the occasion. It is the charge, the session, the event log, the texts and their delivery receipts, and the device the guest paid from.

Why a bank can use it

It shows its own working.

The report brings the available details together so your team can review the visit and prepare a response.

Key evidence pointsHow the guest paidReceipt, tip includedSession timelineVehicle, photographed at check-inData sources and integrity

supporting visit details, ready for review

The charge
Card summary, time, itemised receipt, tip line
The session
Vehicle on record, and the photograph taken at check-in
The event log
Every event in order, each with the name of whoever recorded it
The texts
Each message, its number, and what the carrier said about delivery
The checkout
Available details from the payment
The card
How it was presented: in person, wallet, or typed in
The dispute
Reason, network code, evidence deadline, ticket number
Supporting information
Supporting details available for review

The rule that makes it worth reading

A fact it cannot verify never becomes a sentence.

A document going to a bank cannot guess. Every claim has to come from the bundle, and the ones that would be weakest are the ones it refuses to make.

It will say this

"The physical card was presented in person at the point of sale."

Because the charge itself says the card was present, and presence is the thing a "never there" claim denies.

It will not say this

A card typed in by hand earns no line at all.

It is not evidence that anybody was there, so it is left in the payment details and kept out of the argument.

Valletto assembles the evidence and renders the document the moment the dispute lands. Submitting it to the bank is still yours to do, in Stripe.

Before it reaches the bank

The guest reads it first.

Most disputes are somebody not recognizing a line on a statement. The same document goes to them by text, on a link that expires, and whatever they tap is appended to the record.

About a charge fromthe 18th. Here is thefull record of it.the report itselfI recognize thisI do notevery tap is kept,including a change of mind

Thirty minutes

Bring us your last dispute.

Tell us what happened and what you had to send. We will show you what the same night looks like when the record was already being kept.